The Surprising Leader in Alternative Energy Technologies

July 28th, 2011 by admin No comments »

The state of Alaska is known for its production of oil and natural gas. Rich deposits of fossil fuels have powered American cars and homes as well as the Alaskan economy for decades. Indeed, because of the enormous amount of oil pumped from Alaska’s north slope, every Alaskan resident get to deposit a dividend check from the Permanent Fund each year.

What most people do not realize is that Alaska could also be one of the leaders in developing alternative energy technologies. The Last Frontier is rich in geothermal energy sources. Alaska is also home to many rivers that can provide hydroelectric power. And wind, especially around coastal areas, is ubiquitous in Alaska, providing a huge potential resource of wind power just waiting to be harvested. Even solar power is not out of the question in Alaska, with its long summer days. Here are some of the latest developments of non-fossil fuel based energy sources available in the largest US state.

Wind power is one of the fastest power sources to bring on stream. The community of Kodiak is planning to meet 95% of its energy need from renewable sources by the year 2020 from wind. Kodiak recently invested $21.5 million in wind turbine that began operating in 2009. The wind energy alone will save the community 800,000 gallons of petroleum-based fuel annually, worth about $2 million. Another example is on Fire Island in the Cook Inlet, south of Anchorage. A wind farm is under construction there that will produce energy sufficient to heat and light 19,500 homes.

Geothermal energy is also available. Consider the Chena Hot Springs resort, which is located miles from any electrical grid. Here a 400 kilowatt geothermal electric power plant provides all the energy needs for the site. There are also 40 active volcanoes in Alaska and more than 100 other hot springs, all of which offer potential sources of geothermal energy that can be tapped. A big advantage of geothermal energy is that it is available 24/7 regardless of the weather, unlike solar or wind power.

Water provides is another potentially abundant energy resource in a way different from traditional hydroelectric power. Alaska has some of the world’s largest tidal fluctuations, offering another rich and predictable source of energy. Ocean Renewable Power Company is planning to test tidal generated energy in the Cook Inlet, by setting up turbines to harness the swift current that result from the tidal movements there. If successful, renewable power for thousands more homes will be available.

Even biofuels is getting some play in Alaska, although to a lesser extent than other renewable energy sources. In the case of Alaska, the sources of the biofuels production would be wood, fish byproducts, sawmill waste, and municipal trash.

Alaska is making smart investments now in renewable energy sources for the future. If the scenario plays out successfully, Alaska could be a surprising leader in renewable energy.

How To Promote New Waste Technologies As An Alternative to Incineration In 5 Easy Steps

July 25th, 2011 by admin No comments »

The best projects normally take several steps to carry out. Most rewarding tasks take some time, demand a good number of basic steps plus consistent effort. To have success it’s essential to prepare yourself well, set clear objectives, work effectively and persevere. Whichever task or project you choose, this tends to be true, but for new waste technology projects this is particularly true, due to the difficult problems faced.

But it’s not that difficult really, if you break it into clear individual steps as we have done in the article which follows.

This is the one and only way to achieve success at your goal to promote new waste technologies as an alternative to incineration, and suggest it can be simplified to merely 5 simple steps:

Step 1. For a UK alternative to incineration to be viable it will need to be good at the diversion of waste from landfill. Most importantly the diversion of organic/biological waste from landfill, to meet European Union targets. You will need to consider what are these technologies and how will they help to meet LATS. This will be a task of critical importance because the introduction of the Landfill Allowances Trading Scheme (LATS) in April 2005 has left all local authorities with key decisions to make in terms of how they are going to divert enough biodegradable municipal waste (BMW) from landfill to meet their LATS targets. Most UK local authorities have been using incineration after recycling and diverting all but their residual waste, but alternatively they could introduce new waste technologies into their waste management process stream.

However, as we have shown this type of solution brings with it a number of questions. Not least, as we have already indicated we must ask what are these technologies and how will they help to meet LATS?

Make sure you do not overlook or by-pass this, because answering these questions is essential to select a viable new waste technology, and the stakes are high as unless the local authority meets its LATS target, it will be fined by the UK government. And, if nationally we do not meet the targets overall, the EU will fine us as a nation.

Step 2. Any adoption of a new waste technology must be able to satisfactorily answer the question; What are the residuals and are there markets for these? This important step demands all your attention. Here is the way to do it right: Make sure that you select a new waste technology from which the residuals can be sold, if not at a profit, at a price which helps pay for the extra cost of the waste technology which will process the waste. There are a few reasons this is often important. The principal one is no new waste technology will be acceptable to the public and comply with LATS, or as a financial proposition, unless it produces residual materials which have a value and don’t in the end have to be landfilled for the want of an alternative disposal route.

Step 3. Decide who will invest in the technologies. The reason for this will be to that a private partner will be needed to implement any new waste technology, as the Council won’t have the skills or money to go it alone. Additionally you will want to make sure that the partner is a solid company which holds the necessary skills and will pass the government’s tests for the award of public investment, once the project gets started.

Step 4. Consider, will the technologies receive planning permission, how long will this take and what are the issues likely to hinder this process. Which means, talking to the local authority planning experts and gauging public opinion in the area.

Step 5. How will the public perceive these technologies? Are they likely to create huge public debate? Also, will the preceding issues in combination with the last question all add up to a large list of unknowns which make embarking upon the promotion of new waste technologies too risky for the local authority to carry out. After all, it is not their role to speculate in new technologies that are largely unproven and may not work, potentially developing prototype plants and causing wastage of ratepayers money. Additionally, how do you get all those who are required to play a key role in the decision-making process suitably informed to perform their roles effectively?

Finally, if you have followed the above suggestions closely, you can expect to triumph over the down sides and achieve your goals, with all the current advantages and also the fruits that implies! Accept the rewards and respect. You managed to do it therefore you deserve the credit! It was you that set out to reach your ultimate goal and also you who succeeded!